Smoleńsk 2018-04-11
Technical Report.
On April 11, 2018 (Wednesday), the day after the eighth anniversary of the Smolensk attack, the subcommittee headed by Minister Antoni Macierewicz (the most fiercely attacked person by freemasons and liberals) presented the Technical Report of the Tupolew Tu-154 M plane crash of April 10, 2010 year, or actually the Smolensk Assassination.
The Technical Report brings us closer to the truth only in part, as it only answers the question – Why were the passengers and aircraft crew killed? The report was released to present the facts gathered to the public and to show that there is still a tremendous amount of work ahead of the subcommittee that has not been done in the weeks after the disaster, and it should have been. She did not stay because the real causes were covered up.
The most important result of presenting the Technical Report is the cancellation of the existing report. The report of the Jerzy Miller commission of July 29, 2011 is invalid and is canceled. And it is not about Poland, but about the international scene, on which from now on only the Technical Report, and in the future the Final Report, will be binding, of the subcommittee of Minister Antoni Macierewicz.
The Smolensk subcommittee invalidates the classification of the causes of the Tupolev Tu-154 M plane crash in Smolensk as a controlled flight to the ground caused by a pilot’s error. The plane was destroyed in the air as a result of the explosion.There are seven points in the introduction to the Technical Report that justify the thesis that there was no pilot error. The explosions (not one) and the power failure occurred before the plane hit the ground. The largest explosion took place in the left part of the fuselage in the area of the third saloon, where the shock wave tore the left passenger door, blew up the first and third spars of the left center wing, and the bodies of a dozen passengers of the third saloon were destroyed and scattered over a distance of over 100 meters.
One of the passengers’ body was pushed back against the toilet door with such force that the door wrapped itself around him. The left passenger door was pushed at a speed of ten times the actual speed of the plane into the ground to a depth of about one meter.
The Technical Report does not contain political interpretations, suggestions or allusions. The list of evidence provided in this document is not exhaustive. The findings of the Jerzy Miller Committee turned out to be untrue in the light of the conducted research, incorrectly indicating the causes of the disaster, and incorrectly repeating the findings of the IAC Committee.
Russian air traffic controllers at the Severny airport in Smolensk, in consultation with the commander of the air transport troops, General W. Benediktov in Moscow, consistently gave incorrect information to the crew of the Tu-154 M aircraft during the approach to landing on April 10, 2010. The approach of the Tu-154 M was preceded by a control incident by the Russian military aircraft Iliuszyn IL-76, which was to check the operation of the navigation systems of the Severny airport. The Iliuszyn IŁ-76 aircraft made two landing attempts in the weather below the minimum and each time it descended to a height of just a few meters above the landing area of the airport on its left side.
Contrary to the statements of Jerzy Miller’s report, General Andrzej Błasik was not present in the cockpit of the Tu-154 M during the crash. It had no influence on the course of the disaster. Jerzy Miller’s commission accused General Andrzej Błasik without any evidence.
First, the left wing exploded and led to the collapse of the structure of the detachable part of the wing more than 900 m before the RWY 26 threshold of the Smolensk Severny airport. The detonations destroyed the slots, ribs and spars and plating, and scattered their fragments over an area over 30 meters wide and over 400 meters along the plane’s flight. Then a hatch detached from the wing, parts of which were also found scattered over a distance of more than 400 meters.
After the plane crossed the TAWS 38 point (710 m before the RWY threshold), a number of failures occurred: the left engine, generator, flaps, landing gear, the first hydraulic system and the magnetic heading indication system, as well as the malfunction of both radio altimeters.
Many times, the Smolensk Subcommittee, supported by the activities of the Polish government, made efforts to both regain Polish property and to be able to, for example, inspect the area on the spot. However, the mosquitoes remain deaf to such basic demands. We would like to remind you that as early as in the fall of 2010, the Russians wanted to send the wreckage back to the steelworks and permanently destroy it.
The twin Tupolew Tu-154 M Nb 102 plane, currently standing (2018) at the Minsk Mazowiecki Airport, turned out to be a valuable source of data. This plane was not used at all by the Jerzy Miller commission, nor by the commission of KGB General Anodina. On the basis of this plane, experts from the National Institute of Aviation Research in Wichita in the USA prepared models for research on the course of the crash. It was this research that completely refuted the theses put forward in the twin reports of Jerzy Miller and KGB General Anodina. According to these reports, after losing the wing, the plane turned to its back and hit the ground, burying everyone on board. This hypothesis was falsified by a simulation based on the finite element method, which was performed by a member of the commission, Dr. Eng. Grzegorz Szuladziński. And for common sense – if it were so, then all victims should be in the wreckage and its vicinity, and not scattered over a large area and dismembered.
The subcommittee of Minister Antoni Macierewicz made extensive use of the Report of Archaeologists who conducted their research six months after the attack. This report provided a lot of valuable information about the monograph "landscape after the storm". Jerzy Miler did not want to use this report at all.
There is no doubt about the nature of the explosion. There is a discussion as to its exact shape. The plane was damaged by at least two explosions. The first one exploded the left wing of the plane so that it cut off one end, and then destroyed the left wing flap. The disintegration of the plane into tens of thousands of parts, the lack of a crater after hitting the soft ground of the over 70-ton aircraft and the characteristic destruction of the victims’ bodies are all evidence of the explosion. The explosion blew up the third lounge, killing all its passengers and scattering their remains along the length of the wreckage. The detonation wave, going towards the tail of the plane, tore this part of the fuselage and caused the left and starboard sides to fold out together with the roof, outside the structure. All the seats that were torn were completely destroyed. Separate position of the seats, backrests and frames.
Interestingly, the mosquitoes themselves talk about the outbreak. However, their translation comes down to a hydraulic explosion, caused by a sudden stop of a flying object, and the fuel in it hits the walls of the tank and causes an explosion. Only then the blast should be pointing forward, not in all directions. Besides, the amount of fuel was already low to accomplish such great destruction.
The catastrophe is the result of a series of deliberate actions. The subcommittee does not use the word assassination because the research is still ongoing and there is a minimum of 10 months for the final report. Research in the US is still ongoing. The exhumation of the remaining victims is still in progress and the prosecution is yet to do a great deal of work.
Our website has been using the word "assassination" for eight years now. This is because planes do not crash so much, especially with the national Catholic elite. And just like Minister Antoni Macierewicz, we are, on a much smaller scale, called frauds and liars, and that we wrote nonsense. Since the Republic of Poland is a country of democratic freedoms, we have the right to our own opinion. True virtue is not afraid of the critic.
Written by Karol Placha Hetman